MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183403999

VIAJAN ALUMNOS A CANAD

2012· article· es· W2183403999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sin Autor

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta UNAM (2010-2016) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Social Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

POR PRIMERA VEZ, ALUMNOS DE VARIAS FACULTADES DE LA UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL VIAJARON A CANADA PARA TOMAR EL CURSO INTENSIVO DE INGLES DENOMINADO INVIERNO PUMA. LOS ESTUDIANTES ASISTIERON A LA ESCUELA DE EXTENSION DE LA UNAM, UBICADA EN OTTAWA-GATINEAU, EN EL PERIODO INTERSEMESTRAL DE ENERO, PARA MEJORAR SU NIVEL DE CONOCIMIENTO DE ESE IDIOMA. HASTA AHORA, ESTE TIPO DE CURSOS SE REALIZABA SOBRE TODO EN VERANO. LOS JOVENES TAMBIEN SE FAMILIARIZARON CON LA VIDA INTERNACIONAL, MEDIANTE VISITAS A LAS UNIVERSIDADES DE CARLETON Y DE OTTAWA, E INTERCAMBIARON EXPERIENCIAS CON ALUMNOS LOCALES. FEDERICO FERNANDEZ, DIRECTOR DE LA ESCUELA DE EXTENSION, EXPLICO QUE EL ALOJAMIENTO CORRIO A CARGO DE FAMILIAS CANADIENSES. ADEMAS DE LAS HORAS DE CLASE, EL PROGRAMA ESTUVO CONFORMADO POR TALLERES DE VOCABULARIO Y PRONUNCIACION, ASI COMO DISCUSION EN SESIONES DE CINE DE AQUEL PAIS. ESTE GRUPO, CONSTITUIDO POR ALUMNOS DE LICENCIATURA Y EGRESADOS DE LAS FACULTADES DE CIENCIAS POLITICAS Y SOCIALES, CONTADURIA Y ADMINISTRACION, DERECHO, FILOSOFIA Y LETRAS E INGENIERIA, SE VINCULO DURANTE TRES SEMANAS CON LA CULTURA INVERNAL CANADIENSE. CAMINARON SOBRE RAQUETAS EN UN BOSQUE NEVADO, PATINARON EN LAGOS CONGELADOS Y ASISTIERON A UN PARTIDO DE HOCKEY SOBRE HIELO, JUNTO CON SUS PROFESORES DE INGLES.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1420.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGaceta UNAM (2010-2016)Same topicCultural and Social Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207