Basin Fluids 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
with eNd values of -6 to -9 and Jura-Cretaceous foreland basin sediments that show a bimodal pattern of heterogeneity . The negative values for Ordovician and older sediments are consistent with sediment derivation from proximal Canadian Shield whereas the signatures of the foreland strata reflect the relative proportions of detritus derived from erosion of pre-Devonian strata in the thrust belt, characterized by negative Nd signatures, and volcanic detritus, likely derived from the southern Coast Belt of southwest Canada or possibly terranes west of the Omineca Belt, characterized by relatively juvenile (positive) Nd signatures. However, the enigmatic and unexpected results are the compositions for the Devonian through Jurassic sedimentary rocks. A positive shift of 6 eNd units occurs in the Upper Devonian Sassenach Formation (eNd -9.5) and persists until foreland basin sedimentation in the Late Jurassic. The Devonian to Triassic (Whitehorse Formation) sNd values vary only slightly from eNd -9.5 to -6.7 and requires input from an isotopically juvenile and well-mixed source. A similar isotopic shift is seen in miogeoclinal strata from the northern Canada Cordillera although the magnitude of the shift and the timing is somewhat different as a consequence of the local effects of the Peace River Arch and eruption of REE-enriched volcanic rocks. Three scenarios are possible: 1) sediment input from juvenile fringing island arcs and back-arc basins such as Quesnellia and Slide Mountain Terrane, 2) sediment derivation from the Appalachian orogen of eastern North America and 3) sediment derivation from Ellesmerian sources in the Canadian Arctic. Option 1 is considered unlikely because typical arc magmas, such as basaltic andesite, have much lower Nd concentrations than continental crust (10 ppm vs. 35 ppm, respectively) and mass balance calculations suggest that more than 50% of the material in the samples we analyzed would have to be volcanic in origin. This is difficult to reconcile with quartzose composition of many of the units (Sassenach, Rocky Mountain Group etc.). Option 2 is tantalizing because of the isotopic similarity of the DevonianTriassic of the Cordillera with sedimentary strata of the Appalachian foreland (e.g. Ouachita trough) but is considered unlikely because of the persistence of the TransContinental Arch, a paleogeographic feature that would have blocked drainage westward from the Appalachians. Option 3 is considered the most likely and is supported by our recent analyses of preCarbonifer ous strata from the Innuitian foldbelt of the Canadian Arctic that demonstrate an isotopic link between sediments of western Canada and foreland basin sediments of the Innuitian. Cross-formational flow in west-central Alberta: implications for petroleum migration and entrapment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.354 | 0.147 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".