MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical Mathematical Psychology

2015· other· en· W2183537931 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew J. Shanahan, James T. Townsend, Richard W. J. Neufeld

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychopathologyCognitionPsychologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)AnxietyMathematical psychologyCognitive psychologyBasic scienceMathematical structureClinical psychologyCognitive sciencePsychiatryMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Clinical mathematical psychology is the application of mathematical thinking to the examination of significant problems in psychopathology. Examination of psychopathological conditions can be done using mathematical approaches tailored to detecting deficits in cognitive and other functioning that are characteristic of a given disorder. Examples exist for schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, and several neurodegenerative disorders. Clinical mathematical psychology includes, more generally, the use of formal terms to specify interrelation of constructs of interest for pathological phenomena. This mathematically based way of addressing patterns of unhealthy psychological functioning provides more specified language for theory development and recruits advanced mathematics for formulating research questions. Clinical mathematical psychology can be a valuable tool for the scientific study of the causes, effects, and treatment of mental illness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.199
GPT teacher head0.551
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Encyclopedia of Clinical PsychologySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207