MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING CERTAIN TRIGONOMETRIC INEQUALITIES

2007· article· en· W21835406 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mowaffaq Hajja

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Inequalities in Pure & Applied Mathematics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMathematicsTrigonometryDirection cosineTrigonometric functionsSet (abstract data type)InequalityPythagorean trigonometric identityAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsMathematical analysisGeometryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT. In this note, we describe a method for establishing trigonometric inequalities that involve symmetric functions in the cosines of the angles of a triangle. The method is based on finding a complete set of relations that define the cosines of such angles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Inequalities in Pure & Applied MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and GeometryFrench-language works237,207