O PAPEL DO ENFERMEIRO E AS RECOMENDAÇÕES PARA A PROMOÇÃO DA SAÚDE DA CRIANÇA NAS PUBLICAÇÕES DA ENFERMAGEM BRASILEIRA* THE ROLE OF THE NURSE AND THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROMOTION OF PEDIATRIC HEALTHCARE IN BRAZILIAN NURSING PUBLICATIONS EL PAPEL DEL ENFERMERO Y LAS RECOMENDACIONES PARA LA PROMOCIÓN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research had as its objective to identify within Brazilian nursing publications the role of the nurse and the recommendations for pediatric health promotion. This was a descriptive, exploratory, bibliographic research with a quality approach conducted through database searches. The contents of publications were analyzed based on the proposed operative protocol of Minayo. The categories were described and discussed in light of the analyzed publications and of the reference of health promotion. As a result, it was possible to identify two categories: the nurse’s role in promoting health of the child and the recommendations for compliance. It was concluded that the role of nurses identified within Brazilian nursing publications were directly related to three fields of action from the Ottawa Charter for health promotion: development of personal skills, strengthening of community actions, and the reorientation of healthcare services. However, there was also an indirect relationship between the implementation of healthy public policies and the creation of supportive environments. Overcoming the difficulties in fulfilling the roles of the nurse in promoting health of the child will occur with the intensification of health education. The recommendations presented reflect the concerns of nurses with health promotion and guide these professionals in fulfilling their role. However, there is still a need for these actions to be specifically related to nursing, contributing to the visibility of the profession.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.067 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".