MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183599491 · doi:10.5206/uwomj.v82i1.4626

Digital rectal examination in prostate cancer screening

2013· article· en· W2183599491 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Angela Zhang, Thomas Fear, Hammood Ahmed

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Western Ontario Medical Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRectal examinationMedicineProstate cancerTest (biology)Anal sphincterPhysical examinationProstateColorectal cancerHarmGynecologyCancerRadiologyInternal medicineSurgeryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digital rectal examination (DRE) may be performed in order to identify rectal disease, prostate cancer, examine anal sphincter tone, or to examine female gynecological structures. Rectal examination has been described by conflicting opinions as both a cause of “more harm than good” and conversely as a “crucial part of the examination [of a patient]”.1, 2 Despite its many diagnostic applications, the test is also uncomfortable for some patients, doctors, and medical students. This article will focus on the characteristics of the test in prostate cancer screening, and how the challenges of patient resistance and medical student education can be addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Western Ontario Medical JournalSame topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207