MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183655985

Determination of aluminum ion at ng mL -1 level in natural water using trimethoxyphenylfl uorone by light-absorption ratio varia- tion approach

2006· article· en· W2183655985 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ren Jiao, Teng Zeng, Jue Ran Li, Jia Xiang Yang, Hong Wen Gao

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of analytical sciences and spectroscopy · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReagentDetection limitChemistryAcetoneMasking agentBromideAbsorption (acoustics)Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidSelectivityTrace AmountsFluorescenceLinear rangeNuclear chemistryInorganic chemistryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChromatographyChelationMaterials sciencePhysical chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complexation between trimethoxyphenylfl uorone (TMPF) and Al 3+ is sensitive at pH 10.98 in the presence of both cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and acetone. CTAB was used as a sensitizer to bind TMPF and acetone as a stabilizer to inhibit the oxidation of the TMPF-Al complex. The masking reagent, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is helpful to improve the selectivity of the complexation. The spectral correction technique was applied to characterize the Al-TMPF complex and the formation of Al (TMPF) 2 complex. The light-absorption ratio variation approach (LARVA) is used for quantitative detection of Al 3+ using complexation in a range from of 2 to 50 ng mL -1 of Al 3+ . The lightabsorption ratio difference in this range is linear. The limit of detection (3σ) of Al 3+ by the LARVA is only 2 ng mL -1 . Trace amounts of Al 3+ in natural water has been determined with satisfactory results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of analytical sciences and spectroscopySame topicWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207