MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2183699840 · doi:10.5957/icetech-2008-134

Advances in Marine Ice Profiling for Oil and Gas Applications

2008· article· en· W2183699840 on OpenAlexaff
David B. Fissel, J.R. Marko, Humfrey Melling

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsASL Environmental Sciences (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceSonarProfiling (computer programming)GeologyIcebergIce shelfLiquid waterIce formationSea ice concentrationRemote sensingArctic ice packOceanographyMeteorologyCryosphereSea ice thicknessComputer scienceAtmospheric sciencesEarth scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Upward-looking sonar (ULS) is a primary source of data for measurements of ice thickness. Self-contained units now have the data capacity and accuracy/resolution sufficient for unattended operation over periods of months to years. Recent technological advances have now led to the next generation of ice-profiling sonar (IPS), incorporating much expanded on-board data storage capacity (69 Mbytes to 8 Gbytes) and powerful onboard real-time firmware. The enlarged data storage of the newest ice profilers enables collection of ocean wave data during periods of open water in summer. Semiautomated detection of open water in the form of short duration occurrences of ice leads is now possible. The capability to derive acoustic returns from a range of levels in the water column and the lower part of the ice cover hold promise for improving understanding of processes occurring during the initial freeze-up and early consolidation phases of sea ice growth and for detection of ice properties in the keels of consolidated ice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→