CIP and Parallel Computing Based Numerical Solutions of 3-D Slamming Problems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the further development of numerical simulation method to solve 3-D highly non-linear slamming problems using parallel computing algorithms. The water entry problems are treated as multi-phase problems (solid, water and air) and governed by the Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations. They are solved by the three-dimensional constrained interpolation profile (CIP) method. The interfaces between different phases are captured using density functions. In the computation, the 3-D CIP method is employed for the advection phase of the N-S equations and a pressure-based algorithm is applied for the non-advection phase. The bi-conjugate gradient stabilized method (BiCGSTAB) is utilized to solve the linear equation systems. A Message Passing Interface (MPI) parallel computing scheme was implemented in the computations. For the parallel computations, the three-dimensional Cartesian decomposition of the computational domain was used. The speed-up performance of various decomposition schemes were studied. Validation studies were carried out for the water entry of a 3-D wedge and a 3-D ship section with prescribed velocities. The computed slamming force, pressure distribution and free-surface elevations are compared with experimental results and numerical results by other methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".