MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2183775192

PSC 833, an inhibitor of P-glycoprotein inhibits 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colorectal carcinogenesis in male Fischer F344 rats.

2006· article· en· W2183775192 on OpenAlexaff
Janarthanan Kankesan, Ezio Laconi, Alan Medline, Jake J. Thiessen, Victor Ling, Prema M. Rao, S. Rajalakshmi, D.S.R. Sarma

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
Keywords1,2-DimethylhydrazineColorectal cancerCarcinogenesisDimethylhydrazineInternal medicineMedicineBasal (medicine)EndocrinologyCancer researchChemistryGastroenterologyCancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The expression of P-glycoprotein (Pgp) is intimately associated with cancer development. In order to explore the therapeutic value of Pgp as a target for chemotherapy, we studied the effect of PSC 833 (PSC), a potent inhibitor of Pgp, on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (1,2-DMH)-initiated colorectal carcinogenesis in rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male Fischer 344 rats, initiated with 1,2-DMH coupled with partial hepatectomy, were exposed to dietary 1% orotic acid for 22 weeks. They were then fed either the AIN93G basal diet (BD) or BD containing PSC (a daily dose of 15 mg/kg body weight) for 35 weeks. RESULTS: PSC significantly inhibited colorectal tumor multiplicity by 53% and tumor burden by 74%. PSC-mediated inhibition was evident in tumors as small as 2 mm in diameter and remained effective throughout the course of tumor growth. Histological assessment showed that PSC significantly inhibited tumor progression to colorectal adenocarcinoma by 63%. CONCLUSION: Collectively, this study indicates that PSC inhibited experimental colorectal carcinogenesis initiated with 1,2-DMH in rats.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→