MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183858809

Incentive Mechanism Design in Retailer Private-label Business under Random Yield: A Principal-agent Model with Hidden Actions

2014· article· en· W2183858809 on OpenAlexaff
Hangfei Guo, Mahmut Parlar

Bibliographic record

VenueUEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncentiveYield (engineering)Mechanism designBusinessPrincipal–agent problemPrincipal (computer security)Mechanism (biology)MicroeconomicsMarketingIndustrial organizationComputer scienceEconomicsComputer securityFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

cal centre of Palermo, not only for its history but also for its architectural features.One discovers its unique position seeing the exclusive view from the panoramic terrace on the bay.Over the course of time the palace has welcomed Kings, Princes, Presidents and many famous personalities, and still today enjoys an active life hosting exhibits and important events.Delegates will enjoy the spacious and opulent salons of the Palazzo Butera that make it the perfect location for any kind of event.As Conference chair and vice-chair, we have been assisted by many able colleagues and we thank all of the individuals and organizations that have made this conference possible.They include the EurOMA Board and its Event and Meetings Team, the Scientific Committee, our Keynote Speakers, the contributors to the Special Sessions, the Session Chairs, the Review Committee for the Chris Voss and Harry Boer Best Paper Awards and the Local Organising Committee.We thank particularly the teams at the C&S Congressi and at EIASM with whom we have worked closely and so well over the past two years.Finally, we acknowledge gratefully the financial support of our sponsors and advertisers and the support of the University of Palermo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.882

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia)Same topicConsumer Market Behavior and PricingFrench-language works237,207