COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANALGESIC ALONG WITH TAPING TECHNIQUE VERSUS ANALGESIC ALONG WITH CRYOTHERAPY IN UNILATERAL PATELLO-FEMORAL OSTEOARTHRITIS OF KNEE JOINT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osteoarthritis(OA) is a leading cause of pain and disability in elder people world-wide. Cryotherapy has been proven to control pain in OA knee. Taping has shown relieving the pain.40 patients with unilateral patello femoral OA of knee joint of both the sexes were taken randomly, divided into Group A and Group B. Group A treated with Analgesic and taping Group B treated with Analgesic and Cryotherapy .Both the groups were treated daily for 15 days for 20-25 mins. Patients were evaluated with visual Analog Scale, Goniometer and Western Ontario and Mac Master- Universities Osteoarthritis index on day the1 and the day 15. The values are statistically analyzed to determine theireffect in reducing the pain and improving function. In comparison with VAS, ROM and WOMAC-pain, stiffness and difficulty scores, Group A shows significant improvement of all the parameters than Group B.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".