MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183968781

Generalization in a Model of Infant Sensitivity to Syntactic Variation

2005· article· en· W2183968781 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas R. Shultz, Jean‐Philippe Thivierge, Debra Titone

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship (California Digital Library) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLanguage Development and Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceNatural language processingRule-based machine translationArgument (complex analysis)LinguisticsCognitive sciencePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computer simulations show that an unstructured neuralnetwork model (Shultz & Bale, 2001) covers the essential features of infant differentiation of simple grammars in an artificial language, and generalizes by both extrapolation and interpolation.Other simulations (Vilcu & Hadley, 2003) claiming to show that this model did not really learn these grammars were flawed by confounding syntactic patterns with other factors and by lack of statistical significance testing.Thus, this model remains a viable account of infant ability to learn and discriminate simple syntactic structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship (California Digital Library)Same topicLanguage Development and DisordersFrench-language works237,207