MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2183988983

SOMATIC CELL COUNT AND QUARTER MILK FLOW PARAMETERS FROM UDDER OF DAIRY COWS

2007· article· en· W2183988983 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. Tančin, M. Uhrinčať, J. SUDzINoVá, V. Fol, Dana Tančinová

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMilkingUdderSomatic cell countAnimal scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)Dairy cattleMastitisBiologyLactationGeographyIce calving
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The quarter milk flows were recorded from 62 holstein cows during two consecutive months using special quarter milk flow re corder developed at our institute. Using the four-chamber claw all quarters were milked separately. The recorder consists of four milk receiver jars, the advancing weight (tensometers) of which was recorded each third second. The quarter milk weight registrations during milking were converted to a milk flow rate profile. Before milking, the samples of milk from each quarter were taken for somatic cell count measurement (SCC). The quarters with high SCC had lower milk yield, duration of milk flow and plateau, but higher duration of overmilking than quarter with low SCC. The highest SCC was found in the quarters with long duration of decline phase. There was a tendency of higher SCC in the quarters with longer overmilking only. The shorter milk flow, higher milk yields on one side and longer decline and overmilking phases for the quarters with high peak flow rate on the other were recorded. For good udder health we have to reduce overmilking, however, the reduction of decline phase could be important too.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207