MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184125693 · doi:10.3917/litt.180.0105

Écrire en contrepoint, de Claude Simon à Pierre Bergounioux. Présence et mémoire des Géorgiques (1981) dans La Mort de Brune (1996)

2015· article· fr· W2184125693 on OpenAlex
Katerine Gosselin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLittérature · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article porte sur le récit La Mort de Brune (1996), de Pierre Bergounioux, au cœur duquel est identifié un court pastiche du roman Les Géorgiques (1981) de Claude Simon. Au-delà de l’imitation stylistique à laquelle il procède, il apparaît que le texte de Bergounioux transforme significativement celui de Simon, ces transformations touchant précisément sa composition narrative contrapuntique . L’étude de ces transformations permet ainsi d’étudier l’évolution de l’écriture en contrepoint, du roman de 1981 au récit de 1996. L’hypothèse de cet article est celle d’une double lecture de l’œuvre de Simon que proposerait Bergounioux dans La Mort de Brune , distinguant narration contrapuntique et mémoire contrapuntique des œuvres antérieures. Il est montré comment, par cette double lecture, Bergounioux situe l’œuvre de Simon de manière dynamique dans l’histoire de la littérature, en faisant une œuvre à la fois passée et contemporaine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it