Écrire en contrepoint, de Claude Simon à Pierre Bergounioux. Présence et mémoire des Géorgiques (1981) dans La Mort de Brune (1996)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur le récit La Mort de Brune (1996), de Pierre Bergounioux, au cœur duquel est identifié un court pastiche du roman Les Géorgiques (1981) de Claude Simon. Au-delà de l’imitation stylistique à laquelle il procède, il apparaît que le texte de Bergounioux transforme significativement celui de Simon, ces transformations touchant précisément sa composition narrative contrapuntique . L’étude de ces transformations permet ainsi d’étudier l’évolution de l’écriture en contrepoint, du roman de 1981 au récit de 1996. L’hypothèse de cet article est celle d’une double lecture de l’œuvre de Simon que proposerait Bergounioux dans La Mort de Brune , distinguant narration contrapuntique et mémoire contrapuntique des œuvres antérieures. Il est montré comment, par cette double lecture, Bergounioux situe l’œuvre de Simon de manière dynamique dans l’histoire de la littérature, en faisant une œuvre à la fois passée et contemporaine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".