MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184134753 · doi:10.82308/7410

Optimization techniques for distributed Verilog simulation

2008· article· en· W2184134753 on OpenAlexaff
Lijun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUniprocessor systemVerilogDiscrete event simulationEvent (particle physics)Parallel computingOverhead (engineering)Synchronization (alternating current)Embedded systemMultiprocessingSimulationOperating systemField-programmable gate array

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moore's Law states that computational power will roughly double every 18 months. To the semiconductor designer, this means the never-ending challenge of bringing increasingly larger and more complex ICs (Integrated Circuits) to market. It is well known that the principle bottleneck in circuit design is simulation. Uniprocessor simulators may not be able to keep up with increased demands on them for both speed and memory. This thesis has three main contributions. The first contribution is a distributed Verilog simulation environment which can be executed on a cluster of workstations using a message-passing library such as MPI (Message Passing Interface). It employs OOCTW as the synchronization backend and takes advantage of the open source code of Icarus Verilog simulator. It is designed to be flexible for future extension and optimization. To our knowledge, DVS is the first distributed Verilog simulator. The second contribution is event reconstruction, a technique which reduces the overhead caused by event saving. As the name implies, event reconstruction reconstructs input events and anti-events from the differences between adjacent states, and does not save input events in the event queue. Memory consumption and execution time of event reconstruction are compared to the results obtained by dynamic checkpointing revealing that event reconstruction yields a significant reduction in memory utilization and leads to a faster simulation. The third contribution is a multiway design-driven iterative partitioning algorithm for Verilog based on module instances. We do this in order to take advantage of the design hierarchy information contained in the modules and their instances. A Verilog instance is represented by one vertex in a circuit hypergraph. The vertex can be flattened into multiple vertices in the event that an adequate load balance is not achieved by instance based partitioning. In this case the algorithm flattens the largest instance and moves gates betw

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207