Recurrent atlantoaxial instability due to fracture of the posterior C1 ring: a late finding following posterior C1-C2 fusion using the Halifax clamp.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although its use has fallen out of favor, the Halifax interlaminar clamp was used for many years to treat cervical instability through a posterior approach. Numerous complications, the majority of which are related to hardware failure, have been reported with the use of the interlaminar clamps and have led to the development of alternative techniques for posterior fusion, such as transarticular screw fixation. This report presents a case of recurrent atlantoaxial instability due to fracture of the posterior C1 ring that occurred 12 years after a posterior C1-C2 fusion with Halifax clamps. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case report of symmetric fractures through the posterior C1 ring lateral to the site of the Halifax clamps, resulting in recurrent atlantoaxial instability. This report focuses on the surgical management of this complication and provides a review of the literature that pertains to complications following the use of the Halifax clamp to treat atlantoaxial instability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".