MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184158254

Management of myogenic ptosis in chronic progressive external ophtalmoplegia.

2014· article· en· W2184158254 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Taher Rajabi, Seyed Ziaeddin Tabatabaie, Mohammad Bagher Rajabi, Yalda Abrishami, Seyedeh Simindokht Hosseini, James H. Oestreicher

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePtosisLagophthalmosPalpebral fissureChronic progressive external ophthalmoplegiaEyelidSurgeryVisual acuityExophthalmosWeaknessOphthalmologyMitochondrial myopathy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with mitochondrial myopathies, of which chronic progressive external ophthalmoplegia (CPEO) is the most common, can present with ptosis and proximal limb weakness.1 Ptosis associated with CPEO can provide challenging management problems. This form of ptosis may have poor levator function. Additional features must be considered in determining the surgical treatment. For example, these patients may have limited upgaze and a poor Bell’s phenomenon, poor orbicularis function, dry eye, and resultant poor corneal protective mechanisms.2 This would put them at greater risk for exposure keratopathy after ptosis repair. In this article, we describe our experience with a patient with CPEO who had pre-operative moderate levator function and good orbicularis function that after performing levator resection developed severe exposure keratopathy. A 20-year-old man was referred to Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran with bilateral lagophthalmos. He had a Hutchinson myopatic face similar to the CPEO facial pattern. He had lid swelling. Visual acuity was 2/10 in both eyes. Slit lamp examination revealed corneal edema, epithelial defects bilaterally, and signs of corneal exposure keratopathy (Figure 1A). Figure 1 (A) Photograph showing eyelid edema and corneal injection 2 months after the first surgery in right tarsorrhaphied eye. (B) Photograph 5 years after the first surgery showing narrow palpebral fissure in both eye with corneal opacity at the right eye. ... The patient had been undergone bilateral levator resection 2 weeks before in a city at North of Iran. His pre-operative visual acuity was 10/10 and bilateral ptosis was present with levator function measuring 8-mm in both eyes. The histological report showed ragged red fibers compatible with CPEO. To avoid more severe complications from corneal exposure, tarsorrhaphy was performed on both eyes. After 3 weeks and when corneal signs subsided, one of the tarsorrhaphied eyes was opened, but after 10 days, he represented with signs of exposure keratopathy and again underwent tarsorrhaphy. Tarsorrhaphy and opening of the sutured lids was repeated 4 times in a period of 5 months, and then due to corneal haziness and vascularization the surgery was revised. Both upper eyelids were so tight and without any movement so that after opening of tarsorrhaphy, upper lid retracted and there was not any option unless repeating tarsorrhaphy. In both eyes after opening of the previous incision, the levator was recessed. Lower lid recession with posterior lamellar scleral spacer graft was performed on both eyes for narrowing the vertical palpebral fissure. After this operation, he had mild ptosis with marginal reflex distance measuring 2 mm, and lower lid elevation, so that the vertical palpebral fissure measured 5 mm. Slit lamp examination showed corneal haziness and vascularization in both eyes. Acuity decreased in the right eye to 1/10 and left eye to 4/10. No worsening of signs and symptoms were noticed during the 60 months follow-up (Figure 1B and ​andC).C). However, due to extension of corneal vascularization and thinning the right eye, vision was 3 m finger count in both eyes. In patients with CPEO and ptosis, even with cautious approaches, lagophthalmos with corneal exposure will usually ensue, partially due to increased vertical palpebral fissure and partially due to poor orbicularis function, in addition to poor corneal protective mechanisms.2 To overcome such complication Shorr et al.3 have advocated upper eyelid surgery in conjunction with lower eyelid elevation to improve visually significant ptosis and to maintain corneal protection in these patients. In this procedure, the ptosis repair was combined with maximum recession of the lower eyelid, using a posterior lamellar scleral spacer graft. This combined procedure allows a more aggressive upper lid elevation while minimizing the overall change in vertical palpebral fissure. The overall pre-operative vertical palpebral fissure height is maintained or even decreased. Thus, a more significant improvement in superior visual field is obtained with maintenance of eyelid closure and without the accompanying exposure risk.3 In patients with moderate to poor levator function, between 4 and 8 mm levator resection has been recommended. However, attention just to levator function in determining the surgical treatment is misleading. Since preoperative good function of orbicularis in these patients is not exactly equivalent to its’ function postoperatively, and because of underlying problems such as poor Bell’s phenomenon and poor corneal protection, it is recommended not to increase palpebral fissure height. If one performs levator resection it is better to recess the lower lid with a spacer graft to maintain a narrow, vertical interpalpebral fissure to maximize eyelid closure ability, and reposition this opening centrally over the pupil. One can argue that because the disease is progressive, and sling surgery is adjustable and potentially reversible (by removal), this technique is preferable to levator resection surgery.4 This article suggests that ptosis surgery in CPEO be performed only when vision is compromised by lid height and affects the visual axis. Surgery should be done with full follow-up care. We recommend lower lid recession, using a spacer graft to be combined with sling (with silicone) or levator resection procedures, in poor or good levator function, respectively. This procedure is done to avoid accompanying exposure keratopathy due to increased palpebral fissure and to allow eyelid closure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207