FLOATING MARGIN RATES S&P/TSX 60 BASKET OF INDEX SECURITIES AND INDEX PARTICIPATION UNITS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paragraph k) of article 9001 of the Rules of Bourse de Montreal Inc. (the Bourse) provides for a monitoring and adjustment mechanism of the floating margin rates that are applicable to index securities baskets or index participation units when the volatility of the closing prices of the index exceeds the margin rate set for such index. If the volatility of an index exceeds the floating margin rate that has been established for such index, the floating margin rate is then adjusted consequently for a minimum of twenty (20) working days from the date on which the approved participants are advised of such an adjustment. At the end of this twenty (20) working days period, the floating margin rate is then readjusted at a lower level if regulatory margin intervals calculations indicate a reduction of these intervals. In reason of the recent volatility of the S&P/TSX 60 index, it is necessary to increase the floating margin rate applicable to baskets of index securities and index participation units related to the S&P/TSX 60 index. This new floating margin rate is effective immediately for a minimal period of twenty (20) working days as mentioned above and it replaces those which had been established in circular no. 144-2005 published by the Bourse on October 5, 2005.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".