MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184467059

Bounded Arithmetic and Formalizing Probabilistic Proofs

2014· dissertation· en· W2184467059 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComplexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMathematical proofBounded functionProbabilistic logicArithmeticMathematicsComputer scienceDiscrete mathematicsCalculus (dental)Algebra over a fieldTheoretical computer scienceStatisticsPure mathematicsMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The first theme of this thesis investigates the complexity class CC\nand its associated bounded-arithmetic theory. Subramanian defined CC\nas the class of problems log-space reducible to the comparator circuit\nvalue problem (CCV). Using the Cook-Nguyen method we define the\ntwo-sorted theory VCC whose provably-total functions are exactly the\nCC functions. To apply this method, we show CC is the same as the\nclass of problems computed by uniform AC^0 circuits with unbounded\nCCV oracle gates. We prove that VCC lies between VNL and VP,\nwhere VNL and VP are theories for the classes NL and P\nrespectively. We strengthen Subramanian's work by showing that the\nproblems in his paper are indeed complete for CC under many-one\nAC^0 reductions. We then prove the correctness of these reductions in\nVCC.\nThe second theme of this thesis is formalizing probabilistic proofs in\nbounded arithmetic. In a series of papers, Jerábek argued that the\nuniversal polynomial-time theory VPV augmented with the surjective\nweak pigeonhole principle WPHP(LFP) for all VPV functions is the\n'right' theory for randomized polynomial-time reasoning in bounded\narithmetic.\nMotivated from the fact that no one had used Jerábek's framework\nfor feasible reasoning about specific interesting randomized algorithms\nin classes such as RP and RNC^2, we formalize in VPV the\ncorrectness of two fundamental RNC^2 algorithms for testing if a\nbipartite graph has a perfect matching and for finding a bipartite\nperfect matching.\nUsing Moser's recent constructive proof technique for the Lovász Local\nLemma, we show that VPV + WPHP(LFP) proves the existence of a\nsatisfying assignment for every instance of k-SAT in which every\nclause shares a variable with up to 2^{k-3} other clauses. This result\nimplies the existence of a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for\nfind satisfying assignments such k-SAT instances.\nThe remainder of this thesis was motivated by the lack of fundamental\nprobability concepts like random variables, expectation and variance in\nJerábek's work, which means basic yet useful theorems like\nMarkov's inequality, Chebyshev's inequality, linearity of expectation,\netc were not available in his work. By choosing suitable definitions of\nrandom variables, approximate probability and approximate expectation,\nwe are able prove these theorems and utilize them to prove the\nGoldreich-Levin theorem within the conservative extension HARD^A of\nVPV + WPHP(LFP).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it