MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184499465

Response to Breusch's Critique

2005· article· fr· W2184499465 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lindsay M. Tedds

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical scienceSociologyEthnology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PRECIS Dans sa critique de l’article de Davis E.A. Giles et Lindsay M. Tedds, Ta xes and the Canadian Underground Economy (2002), Trevor Breusch souleve deux points majeurs au sujet du processus particulier d’estimation utilise dans cet ouvrage qui a pour resultat de rendre les conclusions sur l’importance et la forme de l’economie souterraine sans effet. Dans leur reponse a la critique de Breusch, les auteurs font remarquer que ces resultats ne signifient pas que la methode statistique generale utilisee dans l’ouvrage est discreditee ni que l’ouvrage lui-meme n’a aucune valeur : la majeure partie de celui-ci n’est pas visee par la critique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207