MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2184501110 · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.21120.64000

Distribution and Monitoring of Pink Salmon (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) in British Columbia, Canada – a contribution to the development of a Pink Salmon Watch

2003· article· en· W2184501110 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brian Riddell, Richard J. Beamish

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEscapementFisheryOncorhynchusGeographyPopulationDistribution (mathematics)Subarctic climateFish <Actinopterygii>ArchaeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report provides an inventory of pink salmon in British Columbia (BC), Canada and examines past efforts to monitor the spawning escapement of these salmon. The report is based on recent work conducted for the Pacific Fisheries Resource Conservation Council to provide reference material on the distribution and monitoring of Pacific salmonids in BC and the Yukon Territory. The escapement data has been collected since the early 1950s by the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans, and for pink salmon in the Fraser River by the Pacific Salmon Commission (all data are contained in a Microsoft Access database). Pink salmon in British Columbia utilize rivers and streams from the Taku River in northern BC south to the Fraser River. Production in the even and odd-year lines of pinks do not necessarily have equal distributions or population sizes. The extreme example is the absence of Fraser River pink salmon in the even years. Similarly, pink salmon along the west coasts of Vancouver Island and the Queen Charlotte Islands have much smaller pink returns in the odd years than in the even years. However, overall, there are hundreds of pink populations that may be included in a subarctic Pacific monitoring program, and there have been extensive efforts to monitor these returns for approximately 50 years. These monitoring efforts do vary by geographic area and time periods, and very few are monitored in a quantitative manner. This report may be used as a reference for similar reports from other countries but does not presume to recommend a monitoring design. It does discussion sources of variation that should be considered and the need for a common objective as a basis for a monitoring program. Before extensive effort to assess and document this variation is undertaken, there is a need to set objectives and desired levels of precision. Once a comprehensive inventory of pink salmon populations is produced, it is anticipated that the inventory of monitored streams will be up-dated each year. Ultimately, a database will be available to study the impact of climate on one of the key indicator species in the subarctic Pacific. NPAFC Docu 707 October 2003

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→