MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184548158

Evaluation of the Alkaline Phosphatase Level After Subcutaneus Implantation of Three Biomaterials Used in Endodontic Treatment in Prosthetics Purpose

2014· article· en· W2184548158 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L. K. Aminov, Maria Vataman, Ovidiu Stamatin, Florina Filip, Dana Cristiana Maxim, Amelia Surdu Macovei, Laura Elisabeta Checheriță, T. Popa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicEndodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineral trioxide aggregateDentistryAlkaline phosphataseConnective tissueDental implantBiomedical engineeringMedicineImplantChemistrySurgeryPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During endodontic therapy, an important effect of the reparative materials used is to induce periapical recovery and stimulation of osteogenesis. The study aimed to assess the dynamics of alkaline phosphatase levels measured at different time intervals and was conducted by implanting three biomaterials in the rabbit subcutaneous connective tissue, next to the bone. The biomaterials used were: MTA (Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Dentsply, Tulsa Dental, U.S.A.), Sealapex (Kerr, Switzerland), and DiaRoot Bioaggregate (Inovatore BioCaramixInc, Vancouver, BC, Canada). This study was focused on a quantitative analysis, based on biochemical examination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207