Proximate Composition and Energy Density of Forage Fish Delivered to Rhinoceros Auklet Cerorhinca Monocerata Nestlings at Triangle Island, British Columbia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We measured the proximate composition of the four main prey species delivered by adult Rhinoceros Auklets Cerorhinca monocerata to nestlings at Triangle Island, British Columbia, Canada: Pacific sand lance Ammodytes hexapterus, Pacific saury Cololabis saira, juvenile rockfish Sebastes spp., and juvenile salmon Oncorhynchus spp.We also assessed within-species variability in energy density and the variation between two years (2003 and 2004).Both the lipid content and the protein content varied significantly among prey species, causing significant interspecific variation in energy density.Energy density was consistently high in Pacific sand lance, the main prey species at Triangle Island in successful breeding years for the auklets, but variably lower in other prey types such as Pacific saury and salmon.Energy density was lower in 2003 than in 2004 in Pacific saury and, to a lesser extent, in juvenile Pacific sand lance.Our results constitute one of the few assessments of the energetic value of forage fish important in northeast Pacific marine systems and indicate that the choice of prey species can be important for predators including seabirds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it