MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184597494

A TOOLSET FOR MODELLING ANTHROPOGENIC UNDERWATER NOISE

2015· article· en· W2184597494 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Terry J. Deveau

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicUnderwater Acoustics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderwaterWeightingNoise (video)Environmental scienceUnderwater acousticsEnvironmental noiseComputer scienceRange (aeronautics)Marine engineeringSound propagationAcousticsSound (geography)OceanographyEngineeringGeologyAerospace engineeringArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anthropogenic underwater noise is an increasing environmental concern. Accurate predictions of sound levels from anthropogenic sources are required to estimate the impact on marine life exposed to it. JASCO Applied Sciences has been developing software modeling tools for underwater noise exposure estimation for more than 30 years. Elements of the modelling process include estimation of source level, spectrum, and radiation pattern; environmental characteristics of the underwater sound medium and the geoacoustics of the seabed; calculating the acoustic propagation loss; estimating the received levels, both in terms of rms SPL and Sound Exposure Level (SEL); evaluating species-specific impact weighting; and compiling results into comprehensible summaries. These tools have been developed for accuracy in prediction and efficiency in computation, and have been used in work for a wide range of international clients, both commercial and governmental. This paper presents an overview of the anthropogenic underwater noise and exposure modelling work being done by JASCO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicUnderwater Acoustics ResearchFrench-language works237,207