Auto-fiction(s) du réel : « La Pudeur ou l'Impudeur » d'Hervé Guibert
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Si l’autobiographie en littérature ou l’autoportait en peinture et en photographie ont été couramment pratiqués, le cinéma semblait moins adapté techniquement à ce type de réalisation intimiste. L’apparition progressive de procédés de filmage plus légers donnera finalement aux cinéastes toute la liberté nécessaire pour l’auto-filmage. Le film d’Hervé Guibert La Pudeur ou l’Impudeur (1991), en utilisant ce type de dispositif, entrecroise des enjeux de vie avec des enjeux de représentation à travers ce qu’on pourrait nommer « un cinéma du subjectif». Un cinéma qui ne serait plus séparé de la vie mais en constante interaction avec elle, ouvert à l’imprévisible, où la mise en jeu identitaire du cinéaste appelle en retour celle du spectateur. Guibert nous regarde dans les yeux, comme il le fait lui-même face à son miroir pour regarder la mort en face.AbstractIf autobiography in literature or the self-portrait in painting and photography have long been practiced, film seemed to be technically less suited to a certain type of intimate portrayal. The appearance of lighter filming tools, however, finally brought filmmakers the necessary freedom to « self-film ». In using these new technical devices, Hervé Guibert’s film La Pudeur ou l’Impudeur (1991) crosses life challenges with representational ones through what could be called “a cinema of the subjectivity”. This cinema would no longer be separated from life but in constant interaction with life, opened to the unpredictable, in a process which questions the identity game of the filmmaker as well as the one of the viewer. Guibert looks at us straight into the eyes, as he does look straight into his mirror in order to face death.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".