MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184649040 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2015-0275

A detailed first principle study on the structural, elastic, and electronic properties of indium arsenide (InAs) under induced pressure

2015· article· en· W2184649040 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kh. Kabita, M. Jameson, B. Indrajit Sharma, R.K. Brojen, R. K. Thapa

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsIndium arsenideDensity functional theoryElectronic band structureBand gapAb initioIndiumPhysicsArsenideGallium arsenideElectronic structureAb initio quantum chemistry methodsMoleculeQuantum mechanicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ab initio calculation of the structural, elastic, and electronic properties of indium arsenide (InAs) under induced pressure is investigated using density functional theory with modified Becke–Johnson potential within the generalised gradient approximation of the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof scheme. The lattice parameters are found to be in good agreement with experimental and other theoretical data. The pressure-induced structural phase transition of InAs zinc blende to rock salt structure is found to occur at 4.7 GPa pressure with a 17.2% of volume collapse. The elastic properties of both the zinc blende and rock salt structures at different pressures are studied. The electronic band structures at different pressures for both the structures are investigated using the total and partial density of states. The energy band gap of the InAs zinc blende phase is increased with increasing pressure while in rock salt the phase the conduction band crosses towards the valence band and thus shows metallic behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207