‘Blue Angel’ Winter-hardy Hibiscus (Hibiscus ×moscheutos L.)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Winter-hardy hibiscuses are herbaceous perennials in the mallow (Malvaceae) family that belong to six species native to the United States: H. coccineus Walter (scarlet rose mallow), H. dasycalyx S.F Blake and Shiller (Neches River rose mallow), H. grandiflorus Michx. (swamp rose mallow), H. laevis All. (halberdleaf rose mallow), H. lasiocarpos Cav. (hairy-seeded rose mallow), and H. moscheutos L. (crimsoneyed rose mallow) (Lawton, 2004; Winters, 1970). All species in the winterhardy hibiscus group have the same complement of chromosomes (2n = 38) (Klips, 1995) and hybridize relatively easily. They grow naturally in marshy habitats in the eastern part of the United States to southern Ontario (Canada) and in California (H. lasiocarpos). Winter-hardy hibiscuses, especially H. moscheutos and its hybrids, have attractive, tropical-looking flowers with a size of 5 to 30 cm in diameter. Winter-hardy hibiscus species are long-day plants (Warner and Erwin, 2001). All species of winter-hardy hibiscus are long-day plants (Warner and Erwin, 2001) that abundantly produce flowers from midsummer through late fall. The flowers last 1 d and colors range from white through pink to red, depending on the species. Recently developed cultivars of H. moscheutos such as ‘Fantasia’ (PP11,853) and ‘Plum Crazy’ (PP11,854) have lavender flowers. Breeders have also developed cultivars with different leaf shapes and colors and varying plant architecture. ‘Blue Angel’ has been released to provide a cultivar with a unique violet–blue flower color, which is not reported for winter-hardy hibiscus species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it