MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2184794673 · doi:10.4095/214158

Multidisciplinary evaluation of the carbonatehosted Mississippi Valley-type Pb-Zn potential of northern Alberta

2003· report· en· W2184794673 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. J. Rice

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultidisciplinary approachArchaeologyGeographyType (biology)GeologyHydrology (agriculture)PaleontologyGeotechnical engineeringPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multidisciplinary study of Middle and Upper Devonian carbonate sequences in northern Alberta (north of latitude 56?30'N) suggests two areas with increased potential for Mississippi Valley-type lead-zinc deposits. The first is Vermilion Chutes on the Peace River. Encouraging data for this region include 1) a Precambrian basement high; 2) the porous, bitumen-stained, and vuggy character (late calcite and dolomite cements) of the Upper Devonian upper Mikkwa and overlying Grosmont formations; and 3) a possible basement-derived structural trend in the Devonian cover that might provide access for deepsourced metalliferous fluids. The second area is along the Clearwater River near Whitemud Falls, east of Fort McMurray, where the Middle Devonian Methy Formation is exposed. Encouraging data here include 1) two structural highs in the Keg River Formation (Methy Formation equivalent); 2) the presence of minor amounts of saddle dolomite cement; and 3) the locally oxide-altered and faulted character of the Methy outcrop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping→French-language works237,207→