MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184819500 · doi:10.4095/214207

First look at data from a three-dimensional audio-magnetotelluric survey at the McArthur River mining camp, northern Saskatchewan

2003· report· en· W2184819500 on OpenAlexaffabout
James A. Craven, Gary McNeice, Brian F. Powell, R Koch, Irvine R. Annesley, Garnet Wood, J Mwenifumbo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetotelluricsGeologyArchaeologySeismologyGeographyEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of EXTECH IV, three-dimensional audio-magnetotelluric data were collected in the McArthur River uranium mining camp, northern Saskatchewan. One hundred and thirty five audiomagnetotelluric stations were acquired along 11 profiles over the P2 and P2 North mineralized zones with an average site spacing of 300 m. The new audio-magnetotelluric data extend the coverage of an earlier two-dimensional survey and were acquired to provide a three-dimensional view into the subsurface conductivity structure of the McArthur River deposit, the overlying Athabasca Group sandstone, the basement rock types and offsets, and the alteration assemblages associated with the deposit. Digital comb filters were tuned to and removed strong harmonics; then robust audio-magnetotelluric responses were calculated. The resulting induction arrows map different domains of coherent and complex electrical strike. Data qualities and distribution are ideal for the next stage-calculation of a three-dimensional audio-magnetotelluric model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207