MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184875069 · doi:10.1109/sips.2015.7344982

Stochastic implementation of the disparity energy model for depth perception

2015· article· en· W2184875069 on OpenAlexaff
Kaushik Boga, Naoya Onizawa, François Leduc-Primeau, Kazumichi Matsumiya, Takahiro Hanyu, Warren J. Gross

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsComputer scienceAdderReceptive fieldVisual cortexOrientation (vector space)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionEnergy (signal processing)Very-large-scale integrationPixelLayer (electronics)CMOSElectronic engineeringEmbedded systemMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We implement a binocular vision system based on a disparity-energy model that emulates the hierarchical multi-layered neural structure in the primary visual cortex. Layer 1 performs difference-of-Gaussian filtering that mimicks the center-surround receptive fields (RF) in the retina, layer 2 performs Gabor filtering mimicking the orientation selective filtering performed by simple cells and layer 3 has complex cells tuned to detecting 5 different disparities. A VLSI architecture is developed based on stochastic computing that is compact and adder-free. Even with a short stream length, the proposed architecture achieves better disparity detection than a floating-point version by using a modified disparity-energy model. A 1 × 100 pixel processing system is synthesized using TSMC 65nm CMOS technology and achieves up to 79% reduction in area-delay product compared to a fixed point implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.732
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207