The Revitalization of Central City Areas as a Mean for Urban Sustainability - Case Study: Harbour of Rio de Janeiro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The harbour area in Rio de Janeiro, located next to the city centre, is losing its former function due to a transfer of the harbour activities to other places. The area behind the wharf is already very dilapidated, cut of from the water front by an elevated expressway. On the land side, the area is limited by a ridge dominated by slums. As a preliminary study for an international workshop an urban project was developed for a selected area. In this study proposals were formulated to improve the indoor and outdoor quality of the neighbouring slum. Furthermore a new quarter development was elaborated - the Sustainable Urban Module - , suggesting a vivid mixture between traditional European city structures with short ways, a tropicalised environment for pedestrians and cyclists and a dispersed grid of high-rise structures, optimised for natural ventilation. Many sustainable technologies, methods and strategies were implemented. The result is an area with high density, intensive mixture of functions, low sealing of the urban soil and an urban structure focusing a high urban quality while reducing the environmental impact.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".