MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2184972566

Reality Therapy/Choice Theory Today: An Interview with Dr. Robert E. Wubbolding/Thérapie De la réalité/Théorie Du Choix Aujourd'hui : Une Entrevue Avec Dr. Robert E. Wubbolding

2015· article· fr· W2184972566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicCognitive and psychological constructs research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGratitudeCertificateReality therapyPsychologyMedicineLibrary sciencePsychoanalysisPsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dr. Robert E. Wubbolding serves as both the Director of the Center for Reality Therapy and as a senior faculty member for William Glasser International (Christensen & Gray, 2002). Personally appointed by Glasser to be the first Director of Training for the William Glasser Institute, he coordinated and monitored the Certification, Supervisor, and Instructor Training programs between 1988 and 2011. In addition, he is professor emeritus of Xavier University in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, and faculty associate at John Hopkins University.In the area of reality therapy, he has written over 140 articles, essays, and chapters in textbooks. In addition, he has authored 13 books and published many DVDs on reality therapy. His books include the widely acclaimed Reality Therapy for the 21st Century, A Set of Directions for Putting and Keeping Yourself Together (Wubbolding, 2000) and Reality Therapy, published by the American Psychological Association (Wubbolding, 2011).Throughout his lifetime, Dr. Wubbolding has received many awards and accolades, including the Distinguished Alumnus Award, College of Education, University of Cincinnati (2002); Distinguished Graduate of the 1970s Decade, Department, College of Education, University of Cincinnati (2005); and the Gratitude Award for Initiating Reality Therapy in the United Kingdom from the Institute for Reality Therapy United Kingdom (2009). In 2009 he was also awarded the Certificate of Reality Therapy Psychotherapist by the European Association for Psychotherapy. In 2014, he was honoured as a Legend in Counseling by the American Association in Hawaii.In regards to Dr. Wubbolding, William Glasser, MD, founder of reality therapy, stated, is one of my closest and most trusted associates. I couldn't recommend anyone more highly. We now begin the interview:Klingler: Hi, Dr. Wubbolding. Thank you for taking the time to talk with us today. To start, what is choice theory and how does it differ from control theory?Wubbolding: My pleasure. First, let me explain what control theory is because it preceded choice theory. Control theory or control system theory is a theory of brain functioning that goes back a long time. There was a man named John von Neumann who was an associate of Albert Einstein in the 1930s who developed some of the rudiments of control theory (Isaacson, 2007). Other people contributed to the development over the years, and it's based on the fact that our brain is like a cybernetic system and, more recently, analogous to a computer. A better analogy for understanding is that our brain is like a torpedo or a rocket programmed to hit a target. When it gets off base or off its target, it gets what's called negative feedback to the source of power and corrects itself. That's called a negative input control system. Similar to that is a thermostat, which we describe as wanting the room at 72 degrees, and through its mechanism it perceives (this is all by analogy now) that the room is 74 degrees. It then sends out a signal to its cooling system to do something to that outside world to control it so that it can achieve its goal. When it perceives the room is not the temperature that it's supposed to be then it adjusts itself. So, that's an analogy that explains what a control system is and the control theory, or the control system theory, states that our brain functions something like that. It is activated to impact the world around us, so that we get the input or information that we seek, or the insight or the knowledge and information that is desired.William Powers (2005) wrote a book called Behavior: The Control of Perception, in which he further developed the theory stating that our behaviour, which is the output, controls our perceptions of the world, which is defined as how we view things. Glasser developed reality therapy in the early 1960s, but did not have a theory to validate it. He ran across a theory called control theory and thought that it validated the practice of reality therapy. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it