MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2184972566

Reality Therapy/Choice Theory Today: An Interview with Dr. Robert E. Wubbolding/Thérapie De la réalité/Théorie Du Choix Aujourd'hui : Une Entrevue Avec Dr. Robert E. Wubbolding

2015· article· fr· W2184972566 sur OpenAlex
Lacey Klingler, Neal D. Gray

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy · 2015
Typearticle
Languefr
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueCognitive and psychological constructs research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGratitudeCertificateReality therapyPsychologyMedicineLibrary sciencePsychoanalysisPsychotherapist
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dr. Robert E. Wubbolding serves as both the Director of the Center for Reality Therapy and as a senior faculty member for William Glasser International (Christensen & Gray, 2002). Personally appointed by Glasser to be the first Director of Training for the William Glasser Institute, he coordinated and monitored the Certification, Supervisor, and Instructor Training programs between 1988 and 2011. In addition, he is professor emeritus of Xavier University in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA, and faculty associate at John Hopkins University.In the area of reality therapy, he has written over 140 articles, essays, and chapters in textbooks. In addition, he has authored 13 books and published many DVDs on reality therapy. His books include the widely acclaimed Reality Therapy for the 21st Century, A Set of Directions for Putting and Keeping Yourself Together (Wubbolding, 2000) and Reality Therapy, published by the American Psychological Association (Wubbolding, 2011).Throughout his lifetime, Dr. Wubbolding has received many awards and accolades, including the Distinguished Alumnus Award, College of Education, University of Cincinnati (2002); Distinguished Graduate of the 1970s Decade, Department, College of Education, University of Cincinnati (2005); and the Gratitude Award for Initiating Reality Therapy in the United Kingdom from the Institute for Reality Therapy United Kingdom (2009). In 2009 he was also awarded the Certificate of Reality Therapy Psychotherapist by the European Association for Psychotherapy. In 2014, he was honoured as a Legend in Counseling by the American Association in Hawaii.In regards to Dr. Wubbolding, William Glasser, MD, founder of reality therapy, stated, is one of my closest and most trusted associates. I couldn't recommend anyone more highly. We now begin the interview:Klingler: Hi, Dr. Wubbolding. Thank you for taking the time to talk with us today. To start, what is choice theory and how does it differ from control theory?Wubbolding: My pleasure. First, let me explain what control theory is because it preceded choice theory. Control theory or control system theory is a theory of brain functioning that goes back a long time. There was a man named John von Neumann who was an associate of Albert Einstein in the 1930s who developed some of the rudiments of control theory (Isaacson, 2007). Other people contributed to the development over the years, and it's based on the fact that our brain is like a cybernetic system and, more recently, analogous to a computer. A better analogy for understanding is that our brain is like a torpedo or a rocket programmed to hit a target. When it gets off base or off its target, it gets what's called negative feedback to the source of power and corrects itself. That's called a negative input control system. Similar to that is a thermostat, which we describe as wanting the room at 72 degrees, and through its mechanism it perceives (this is all by analogy now) that the room is 74 degrees. It then sends out a signal to its cooling system to do something to that outside world to control it so that it can achieve its goal. When it perceives the room is not the temperature that it's supposed to be then it adjusts itself. So, that's an analogy that explains what a control system is and the control theory, or the control system theory, states that our brain functions something like that. It is activated to impact the world around us, so that we get the input or information that we seek, or the insight or the knowledge and information that is desired.William Powers (2005) wrote a book called Behavior: The Control of Perception, in which he further developed the theory stating that our behaviour, which is the output, controls our perceptions of the world, which is defined as how we view things. Glasser developed reality therapy in the early 1960s, but did not have a theory to validate it. He ran across a theory called control theory and thought that it validated the practice of reality therapy. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,821
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,067
Tête enseignante GPT0,362
Écart entre enseignants0,294 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle