MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2185015319

Specification and measurement of system configuration non functional requirements

2010· article· en· W2185015319 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunctional requirementFunctional specificationSoftware requirements specificationNon-functional requirementAerospaceComputer scienceNon-functional testingSoftwareRequirements analysisSoftware systemSystem requirementsEmbedded systemSystems engineeringReliability engineeringSoftware engineeringEngineeringSoftware constructionProgramming languageRequirementOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The European ECSS-E-40 series of standards for the aerospace industry includes configuration as one of 16 types of non functional requirements (NFR) for embedded and real-time software. Configuration requirements are typically described at the system level as non functional requirements, and a number of concepts and terms are provided in the ECSS series to describe various types of candidate configurations. This paper collects and organizes these configuration related descriptions into a generic model for the specification of software functional user requirements (software FUR) for system configuration NFR, and for measuring their functional size for estimation purposes using the COSMIC ISO 19761 standard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it