Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditionally, and for several years, consumer goods companies have relied heavily on branding to successfully market and sell products.Recently, however, the pharmaceutical industry has recognized the importance and significance of branding even more and has re-structured their marketing departments t o now include brand managers for their products.Consumer goods companies have followed a particular structure in how they brand their products.It is still debatable, however, if this model can be transferred and adapted t o the pharmaceutical industry.This paper discusses the meaning of branding in general, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of it.Next, the need for branding in the pharmaceutical company is discussed followed by the advantages and challenges of branding in this industry.Examples are given of pharmaceutical companies that currently use these branding strategies.The paper proceeds with a discussion about specific branding strategies that are effective for this industry, and finally, consumer perceptions of generic versus branded drugs are examined.I n addition to the secondary research discussed in this paper, additional primary research is conducted to answer several questions pertaining t o consumer views on branded versus generic medications in terms of perception of price differential, advertising differences, and purchase decision influences.The results are discussed followed by some implications and conclusions.Finally, the project concludes with some recommendations to pharmaceutical companies about the results of the paper and tips for successful branding.This paper involves research that is done on two levels, secondary, through library and internet searches, and primary, conducted by the author in order to answer some questions that were not necessarily answered sufficiently from prior research.The information presented in this section comes from the general conclusion of the secondary research, followed by findings of the primary research.Branding has persisted for centuries as a way t o distinguish one producer's goods from another manufacturer's products and services.An understanding of customer-based brand equity is essential in order to fully understand branding and it's advantages.Customer-based brand equity is the differential effect that brand knowledge has on consumer response to the marketing of that brand.I n the world of consumer goods and services, companies have used branding techniques to achieve competitive advantage for many decades.I n the fast moving consumer goods industry (FMCG) brands are viewed as the key assets of the company, and all resources are utilised to create and develop brands (Schuiling and Moss, 2004).While the core principles and strategies for branding a medical product is the same as for any product, there are some differences in the pharmaceutical industry.Due to differences in regulations of marketing and selling drugs, many of the strategies used to market consumer products are unacceptable practices in healthcare.As a result of profound change experienced by pharmaceutical companies, they must embrace marketing and branding strategies to a greater extent then they have in the past.Changes in the way medications are marketed and sold make it significantly important for these companies to brand their products.The early years of the prescription lifecycle will be important for drug companies to establish brands that are ready to be switched to over the counter.Branding can represent a new competitive advantage.Pharmaceutical branding is an important way to create awareness among potential benefits of drugs and medicines.Brand building during the period a new drug remains under patent can help prolong the commercial life of a product once its monopoly status lapses since once the drug's patent expires, the name of the drug has to be changed.Positioning, as well as other important element for branding including communicating the product's differentiation from rivals, pricing it competitively, and emphasizing its performance to physicians, will be instrumental in prescribing the drug.I n order to brand successfully, companies can use a combination of any of the following brand elements: logos, slogans, packaging, names, characters and symbols.Condition branding and corporate branding are also ways in which pharmaceutical companies can successfully market their products, create brand awareness and loyalty.Some research, however, does show that pharmaceutical branding may not actually work.As a result of concerns regarding regulation and the return on investment of direct-to-consumer advertising, pharmaceutical companies have had to re-think their advertising strategies.With respect to consumer perceptions of generic versus branded medication, the author's primary research results show that Tylenol is the first brand that comes to mind when thinking of cold medication.It is the brand chosen by 97% of the respondents.I n addition, although the majority know what Viagra is, only 25% know that it is actually manufactured by Pfizer, indicating that Pfizer, due to advertising regulations, does not use corporate branding on that particular medication.Other interesting findings based on descriptive frequencies are that 97 percent of these individuals are not likely to ask a physician about a brand they saw advertised.Moreover, the majority of the respondents are not likely to purchase a medication after hearing about it on an advertisement.Most of them are very likely to purchase the same brands they have historically purchased.Consumers perceived a difference in price between generic and branded drugs.People place much more importance on brand name as a key decision making influencer in purchasing non-prescription drugs than prescription drugs.I n terms of physician recommendation, pharmacist recommendation, advertisements, and family or friend recommendations, importance levels differ between prescription and non-prescription drugs.For example, people vii place much more importance on brand name for non-prescription drugs than prescription drugs, whereas for non-prescription drugs, they need to choose themselves. DEDICATIONThis project is dedicated to m y loving parents, brother, sister-in-law, and sister, whose limitless love and support -(both emotional and financial!), have always guided me on the path to successfully achieving all m y goals.Thank you for everything, I love you all.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".