MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2185162698 · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2015.7344515

Elimination of artifacts in oscillometric waveforms using empirical wavelet transform to improve accuracy of blood pressure estimation

2015· article· en· W2185162698 on OpenAlexafffund
Tam Huu Nguyen, Anh Dinh, Francis M. Bui, Loc Luu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsWaveformComputer scienceEnvelope (radar)PhotoplethysmogramBlood pressureNoise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Remote patient monitoringWavelet transformWaveletArtificial intelligenceMedicineComputer visionTelecommunicationsFilter (signal processing)Radar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blood pressure measurement is vital in healthcare and many methods have been developed for this purpose of which the oscillometric technique is the most popular. However, accurate estimation of BP using an oscillometric waveform remains a challenge, particularly when the waveform is distorted by noise and artifacts, such as due to involuntary motion. In response, this paper proposes a band pass filtering (BPF) method to deliver a filtered oscillometric signal that is suitable for blood pressure estimation using envelope detection. To validate the utility of the proposed method, two algorithms are implemented to estimate the systolic and diastolic BPs for various operating conditions. The obtained results indicate that a properly designed BPF exhibits significant improvement in delivering accurate BP measurement. It is envisioned that the proposed method is suitable for implementation in emergency medical devices, such as for blood pressure monitoring in an ambulance under significant motion artifacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207