MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2185168709 · doi:10.21307/ijssis-2017-653

Pareto Optimal Robust Feedback Linearization Control Of A Nonlinear System With Parametric Uncertainties

2014· article· en· W2185168709 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeedback linearizationControl theory (sociology)LinearizationParametric statisticsProbabilistic logicBenchmark (surveying)Nonlinear systemPareto principleController (irrigation)Mathematical optimizationRobust controlGenetic algorithmComputer scienceMathematicsControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The problem of multi-objective robust feedback linearization controller design of nonlinear system with parametric uncertainties is solved in this paper. The main objective of this paper is to propose an optimal technique to design a robust feedback linearization controller with multi-objective genetic algorithm. A nonlinear system is considered as a benchmark and feedback linearization controller is designed for deterministic and probabilistic model of the benchmark. Three and four conflicting objective functions are used in Pareto design of feedback linearization controller for deterministic and probabilistic design, respectively. The simulation results reveal the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score0.803

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it