Regional structural data from the Hay River area, Northwest Territories, with emphasis on the Pine Point mining camp
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A regional study undertaken south of Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories, focused on evaluating evidence for structural control on mineralization at Pine Point. Relatively consistent northeastsouthwest (055°) and northwest-southeast (125°, 140°, 150°, and 160-165°) joint sets were observed in the study area. A dominant east-west (085°) joint set was observed in one domain. The orientation of the 055° set is close to that of the Great Slave Lake Shear Zone (045° at Pine Point) and the Hay River Fault (055°; west side of study area). Previous studies conducted on ore-mineral paragenesis at Pine Point proved that hydrothermal dolomite occurred concurrently with the ore-deposition event. This study demonstrates that fracturing at Pine Point pits largely postdated dolomitization, and therefore ore deposition. Furthermore, no structural controls on mineralization were observed in the pits, and are therefore not considered a primary mechanism for ore emplacement in the Pine Point orebodies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".