MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2185296566

Predictive Stratigraphic Mapping of Thick Triassic Doig Sandstones in BC and Alberta

2009· article· en· W2185296566 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alison Essery

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyIsopach mapSedimentary depositional environmentFaciesClastic rockSedimentary rockForeland basinAggradationPaleontologyGeomorphologyCyclothemsGeochemistryFluvialTectonicsStructural basin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A sequence stratigraphic model is proposed to describe the regional deposition of the thick Triassic Doig sandstones in northwest Alberta and northeast British Columbia, south of the Peace River Embayment (Townships 68 to 80, Ranges 11 to 25 W6 including parts of NTS 93-P). Logs, cuttings and about 50 cores from over 1700 wells were used with seismic to determine depositional facies and regional distribution of the Doig. The 20 to 80m thick Doig sandstones (sensu Wittenburg, 1992) occur within complex Halfway and Doig clinoforming packages. Mapping of several north-south striking clinoforms indicates that the thick Doig sandstones occur as isolated north-south oriented lens-shaped bodies. The growth-faulted thickened Doig sandstones are interpreted from core examination to be deltaic and shoreface facies deposited along accommodation driven shelf margins during forced regressions. Downdip, laterally equivalent slow velocity shales on logs and seismic are interpreted to be associated with slumped muds in front of the aggraded sandstones. The overlying Halfway sandstones are interpreted to comprise highstand systems tract in the clinoforming packages. Isopach maps from well data were integrated into the regional sequence stratigraphic interpretation. As accommodation spaces were filled, the depositional systems would shift around the less compacted thick Doig sandstone bodies. Lobe switching is also interpreted at a local scale within individual aggradational sandstone bodies as the sedimentation adjusted to the changing accommodation space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→