MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2185306223 · doi:10.5942/jawwa.2016.108.0050

Enhancement of UV/H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> Efficacy Using Strong Base Anion Exchange Resins

2015· article· en· W2185306223 on OpenAlexafffund
Mohammad Mahdi Bazri, Siva Sarathy, Madjid Mohseni

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Water Works Association · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemical Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsTrojan Technologies (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHydrogen peroxideChemistryUltravioletDissolved organic carbonIon exchangeSulfateBase (topology)NitrateWater treatmentIonNuclear chemistryIon-exchange resinInorganic chemistryEnvironmental chemistryMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Four surface drinking water sources were selected to investigate the impact of strong base anion (SBA) exchange resins—as a pretreatment to ultraviolet/hydrogen peroxide (UV/H2O2)—on dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrate, UV transmittance, and hydroxyl radical (·OH) scavenging of the water samples. Results demonstrated good efficiency of SBA exchange resins at increasing UV transmittance (up to 75%) and reducing DOC (up to 80%), nitrate (up to 75%), and sulfate (up to 75%) within the ion exchange (IX) conditions applied. Additionally, data confirmed the positive effect of IX treatment at reducing the ·OH scavenging characteristics of the water, especially for high‐DOC/low‐transmittance water sources. Electrical energy per order for removing a probe compound (4‐chlorobenzoic acid) was reduced 20 to 40%, indicating improvement in the efficacy of UV/H2O2 treatment. Study findings demonstrated the potential of using the IX process to improve the quality of water undergoing UV/H2O2 treatment and its subsequent benefits on UV/H2O2 efficacy and electrical energy consumption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Water Works AssociationSame topicChemical Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207