MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

To Ski or Not to Ski: Estimating Transition Matrices to Predict Tomorrow's Snowfall Using Real Data

2010· article· en· W2185351175 on OpenAlex
Michael Rotondi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Statistics Education · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSnowEconometricsComputer scienceStatisticsMathematicsMeteorologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using historical data from the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN)-Daily database, the use of Markov chain models is presented to predict a ‘Snow Day’ at eight national weather stations. This serves as a variation of the classic Markov chain precipitation example, predicting a significant snow depth tomorrow from today's snow depth conditions. Stations near Seattle WA, Denver CO, Milwaukee WI, Chicago IL, New York NY and Boston MA, were included as they represent major urban centers, while stations in Montana and North Dakota were added to improve geographical coverage. Estimates of the appropriate transition matrices (ˆi) are provided, as well as a sample of code in the R statistical programming language to enable construction of similar examples for other geographical areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.483
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it