MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2185425034

Ice Thickness Measurements With a Miniature Electromagnetic Sensor Sled

2009· article· en· W2185425034 on OpenAlexaffabout
S.J. Prinsenberg, S. Holladay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceSea ice thicknessGeologyGeodesyBeaufort seaTransectRemote sensingMeasured depthGlobal Positioning SystemArctic ice packGeophysicsOceanographyEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 1991 personnel from the Bedford Institute of Oceanography have been using helicopter-borne Electromagnetic Induction sensors to measure sea ice thickness distributions. To fill the gap between timeconsuming ice measurements through auger ice holes and long-transect profiles lines collected along helicopter-borne sensors, a miniature Electromagnetic Sensor mounted on a sled was tested in 2008 during the IPY’s Circumpolar Flaw Lead Experiment. Real time GPS location and ice thickness data were collected by the EM Sled at 1sec intervals and compared to measurements obtained through ice holes. Good agreement between auger and EM thickness were found along two calibration lines of 170cm and 70cm thickness located on a mobile pack ice floe in the eastern Canadian Beaufort Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Nineteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering ConferenceSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207