MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2185493284 · doi:10.1007/0-387-23198-6_12

Performance Comparison of Distributed Frequency Assignment Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks

2006· book-chapter· en· W2185493284 on OpenAlex
Sonia Waharte, Raouf Boutaba

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceWireless sensor networkWirelessFrequency assignmentComputer networkAlgorithmDistributed computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Minimizing energy consumption of network operations remain a major concern in wireless sensor networks due to the limited energy capacity embedded in sensor nodes. Clustering has been proposed as a potential solution to address this issue, some nodes being responsible for the data gathering of nodes located in their vicinity. However, in order to avoid inter-cluster interference, neighboring clusters must acquire different frequencies. As the specific constraints of wireless sensor networks favor a distributed approach, we analyze modified versions of distributed backtracking, distributed weak commitment and randomized algorithms with a focus on energy consumption. In this context, we find that a heuristic may achieve better results than backtracking-based algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it