MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2185514042 · doi:10.4095/214204

Bedrock geology of the Ellice Hills map area and new constraints on the regional geology of the Committee Bay area, Nunavut

2003· report· en· W2185514042 on OpenAlexaffabout
T Skulski, H A Sandeman, M Sanborn-Barrie, T MacHattie, Mike Young, Chris Carson, R G Berman, Jenna Brown, N M Rayner, D A Panagapko, David Byrne, C. L. Deyell

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayBedrockGeologyArchaeologyGeologic mapRegional geologyGeomorphologyOceanographyGeographyPaleontologyVolcanismTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ellice Hills map area (NTS 56 P), southwest of Committee Bay, contains two belts of Archean supracrustal rocks intruded by younger, diverse plutonic rocks. The Ellice Hills supracrustal strand is a west-northwest-facing belt of interbedded psammite, semipelite, silicate iron-formation, komatiite, and basalt. To the south, the Committee Bay supracrustal belt contains komatiite, semipelite, psammite, and iron-formation, overlain by quartzite, rare intermediate volcanic rocks, and interbedded psammite and semipelite. Ultramafic sills intrude the supracrustal rocks. Folded with the Archean supracrustal rocks is a small outlier of younger meta-arkose and calc-arenite. A regionally extensive, northeast-striking, 2610 Ma intrusive complex of K-feldspar-magnetite granodiorite and monzogranite intrudes supracrustal rocks in the south. To the north, the supracrustal belts are cut by tonalite, granodiorite, monzogranite, and diorite plutons that are likely part of a widespread, 2610-2580 Ma plutonic suite. The northern part of the Ellice Hills area is intruded by a large biotite-muscovite monzogranite pluton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.690
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207