MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2185631849

Results and Analysis of Using the MEDLL Receiver as a

2000· article· en· W2185631849 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Multipath Meter, Bryan Townsend, Jonathan Wiebe, Andy Jakab

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultipath propagationDelay spreadRake receiverMultipath mitigationComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemSIGNAL (programming language)MetreElectronic engineeringRemote sensingTelecommunicationsGeographyEngineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Multipath Estimating Delay-Lock-Loop (MEDLL) is a method for mitigating the effects due to multipath within the receiver tracking loops. Recently the MEDLL receiver was modified to output the multipath parameters, hence the name ‘Multipath Meter’. These parameters include the delay, relative amplitude, and phase of the multipath signal along with the residual values for each correlator. The multipath parameters are estimated by the MEDLL and the residuals indicate the quality estimation process. This paper investigates how the Multipath Meter can be used in real-time monitoring of the GPS signal. Using a GPS simulator the MEDLL receiver is tested to determine how accurately the multipath parameters can be measured. Also, data is collected from an antenna location on the roof of the NovAtel facility at Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Two specific situations are focused on: short delay and long delay multipath. Results show that the Multipath Meter is useful for signal quality monitoring and reference site surveys.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207