Design of Vertical Gas-Liquid Separator and Examination its Effective Parameters in Sarkhoun & Qeshm Treating Company
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The gas-liquid separator with 2845 m 3 /hr of gas phase and 24.54 m 3 /hr of liquid phase is designed in Sarkhoun and Qeshm gas refinery. As for operation conditions and physical Properties of feed, five design methods for design of vertical gas-liquid separator by gravity are applied. The methods are: Iranian Petroleum Standard (IPS), Svrceck and Monnery method from university of Calgary, Scheiman and Gerunda, National Iranian Gas Company (NIGC) and one of French petroleum company (TOTAL). The physical Properties of feed are evaluated experimentally. The experimental results compared with five methods results and TOTAL method has shown the best compatibility with experimental results with 94%. The design parameters for this study are : separation factor K=0.07 m/s, gas terminal velocity ௩=0.17 m/s, height H=3000 mm , diameter D=2450 mm , that is contain three levels for liquid control, LLL=300mm , NLL=475, HLL=560mm
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".