MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2185775720 · doi:10.59236/td2010vol4iss11117

Fostering a Culture of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) at a Polytechnic Institution

2010· article· en· W2185775720 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annemarieke Hoekstra, William T. Dushenko, Eleanor J. Frandsen

Bibliographic record

VenueTransformative Dialogues Teaching and Learning Journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEvaluation of Teaching Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScholarshipExcellenceInstitutionContext (archaeology)Scholarship of Teaching and LearningSociologyPolitical sciencePedagogyManagementTeaching methodSocial scienceTeaching and learning centerGeographyLawEconomicsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on how the scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) is being integrated into the teaching excellence culture at the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT), a premier Canadian polytechnic institution in Alberta, Canada.The Institute's particular culture is discussed along with the emergence of SoTL within NAIT in the context of recent changes in Canadian Higher Education.A number of initiatives to foster SoTL undertaken in the one year of official CASTL affiliate membership are described.In addition, efforts to foster a culture of SoTL at NAIT are discussed in relation to faculty assessment tools and faculty development efforts.The paper closes with an examination of the challenges and opportunities facing the future of SoTL at NAIT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.029
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.330

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0290.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0270.024
Scholarly communication0.0180.004
Open science0.0030.023
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransformative Dialogues Teaching and Learning JournalSame topicEvaluation of Teaching PracticesFrench-language works237,207