Bibliographic record
Abstract
During 2002, seven potential and past-producing dimension-stone sites were examined. A dormant quarry on the Burin Peninsula had produced some large blocks of pink, coarse-grained porphyritic granite from the Ackley Granite. The Loon Bay Granite, northeast of Campbellton, had also produced several large blocks of grey, medium-grained, equigranular granite for use as monument bases. The Frederickton tonalite was examined to determine its potential as a source of grey granite monument bases; there is some potential for large blocks but the common occurrence of dyking and access costs may hinder development. The Pools Cove conglomerate, south of Pools Cove, has potential as a source of grey conglomerate. The Rose Blanche Granite was used in the reconstruction of the nearby lighthouse. This granite occurs as 1-m-thick sheets and is amenable to production of small blocks from this limited resource. The Table Point Formation limestone, northwest of Roddickton, produces attractive polished samples but the intensity of jointing probably precludes its use as a dimension stone. The Canada Bay Marble is an attractive white, streaky rock that polishes well; however, fracturing is common and there is only a very limited amount of massive marble.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".