MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2185918059 · doi:10.19026/rjaset.7.308

Energy Efficient Transmission in Wireless Sensor Networks

2014· article· en· W2185918059 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Tahir, Nadeem Javaid, Muhammad Ali Khan, Shafqat Ur Rehman, A. Javaid, Zahoor Ali Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Journal of Applied Sciences Engineering and Technology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterWireless sensor networkComputer scienceEfficient energy useBit error rateTransmission (telecommunications)Key distribution in wireless sensor networksComputer networkDecoding methodsCoding (social sciences)Sensor nodePower controlEnergy (signal processing)Node (physics)WirelessReal-time computingPower (physics)Wireless networkTelecommunicationsElectrical engineeringEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim of this study is analyzing energy conservation which is one of the most vital aspects in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) for better network durability, since sensor nodes have limited resources of energy. In our propose technique, we have shown that how in presence of existing Error Control Coding (ECC) techniques and decoder complexity energy efficiency increased. That is by estimating transmitter power for each sensor node in given environment. Since adoption of ECC reduces required transmitter power for reliable communication, while increase processing energy of decoding operations. Required transmitter power for sensor nodes in given environment for different coding techniques like Reed-Solomon (RS), Convolutional (CC) energy efficiency and bit error rate has been analyzed for different Eb/N0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Journal of Applied Sciences Engineering and TechnologySame topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207